Patent and Invention Help Forum

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Roberto

Pages: [1]
Thank you for letting me know about the differences between the reward practices of companies and universities. In fact, I was interested in the case of universities but ended up asking as companies since I thought the reward practices were the same.

Even though it is customary for universities and government research labs who own the IP rights to pay the inventors of such IP, I guess this custom is limited to paying only their own employee, right? Therefore, to solve the issue I raised in my previous posts, a contract between both universities would still be necessary, right? That is, if only 'University A' licenses the joint IP to a third company, in the absence of a contract between the universities to share the royalties, the inventor from 'University B' would end up without any reward since there seems to be no law that will force 'University A' to pay the joint inventor from 'University B'. Is my understanding correct? Thank you.

Thank you for your reply. So, from the inventor's perspective, the only way they would be guaranteed a reward for their joint invention (assigned to their respective employers) and licensed to a third company would be, I guess having companies A and B sign a contract that stipulates either:
(1) force all joint owners (companies) to share license revenues regardless of which company negotiated the license with the licensee. Then, each company would reward its employee (the inventor) based on its internal rules;
(2) force all joint owners (companies) to directly pay the inventors regardless of each company the inventor belongs to.

Is my understanding correct?

Suppose company A and company B jointly own the rights of a patent, and that this patent results from the work collaboration between inventor 1 (from company A) and inventors 2, 3 (from company B). Also suppose that both company A and B have internal rules to pay 30% of the revenues generated by patents to the inventors.

By the US patent laws, it seems that one of the companies, for example company A, could independently license the patent to a third company and not share its profits with company B. And that seems to be considered one of the perils of joint owning a patent.

My question is: if company A licenses the patent to a third company, although it is not required to give any money to company B, is company A required by law to pay the inventors 2 and 3 (so all inventors get 10%)? Or company A could give the 30% of revenue to inventor 1 and pay nothing to inventors 2, 3 since they are employed by company B?

Thank you,

Pages: [1]
Menu Editor Pro 1.0.2 | Copyright 2014, Matthew Kerle